What could one essay, written in 1946, have anything to do with the present day? With me? With… you? I don’t—in fact, I couldn’t have—known Mr. Leonard E. Read personally. But that feeling of wonder, that unquenchable longing for something miraculous, the very thing that drives artists and writers on their quest for something beautiful, he knew. He understood. So he took something that human beings overlook. Something people glance at and think, “I’ve seen millions. It’s not exactly beautiful. It’s not expensive. In fact, there are billions of them scattered across the planet. Why should I gaze upon the common pencil with wonder?” And Leonard Read gave us a gift. A gift to quench the unquenchable. A gift to open our eyes to see the beauty in the simple things around us, the thing we overlook everyday of our lives. The things we don’t appreciate. So… what makes a pencil so extraordinary? It is not the shiny lacquered surface, the pink eraser, the ferrule. It is not exquisite. It is not breathtakingly beautiful. It is extraordinary because a pencil is more than purpose. It is more than outward appearance. It is symbolic of the beauty that human beings can create, without even knowing what they are doing! It is a symbol of human collaboration. It is something indispensable that millions help to create. Bits and pieces of a pencil come from all corners of the globe, people that don’t speak the same languages, don’t believe in the same ideals or religions, they are unknowingly united behind an item that will serve the multitudes. And that, friends, is the beauty of a pencil. Leonard E. Read wanted human beings to collaborate. He wanted us to see the profits of unity, how prosperous we become when we are working together. He wanted us to see the fruits of our labor, the beauty of collaboration. We don’t need a boss or an overseer. The government doesn’t have to control every interaction. We can join forces to create something indispensable because UNITY is indispensable. We all can become artists. We create only one piece of a world-wide puzzle. Leonard E. Read wanted us to see the beauty of spontaneous order. How, joined together, we can create something beautiful.
Young Bloggers
Poetry Soup Ep. 8 – “On Not Mowing the Lawn” by Mary Oliver
Ep. 8: “On Not Mowing the Lawn” by Mary Oliver Transcript: Hello, and welcome to Poetry Soup! I’m your host, Emma Catherine Hoff. Today, I’ll be reading and talking about a poem by the great poet Mary Oliver, titled, “On Not Mowing the Lawn.” Mary Oliver was born on September 10, 1935, in Maple Heights, Ohio. Much of her poetry, including “On Not Mowing the Lawn,” describes her relationship with nature. She had felt a strong connection to nature from a young age. She had a hard childhood and escaped into writing for relief from it. Oliver went to both Ohio State University and Vassar College, but did not get a degree from either place. She published many books, including “Blue Horses,” published in 2014, in which the poem, “On Not Mowing the Lawn,” appears. She won the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize. Oliver said that some of her favorite poets (among others) were Walt Whitman, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Percy Bysshe Shelley. Actually, there is a reference to Walt Whitman in “On Not Mowing the Lawn.” Oliver does what many poets do, but in her own way. She pays attention to details. For Oliver, these details are usually found in the natural world — in the looks of animals, the tastes of berries, and flowers blooming. Oliver takes a similar approach in the poem I’ll read today. Let the grass spring up tall, let its roots sing and the seeds begin their scattering. Let the weeds rejoin and be prolific throughout. Let the noise of the mower be banished, hurrah! Let the path become where I choose to walk, and not otherwise established. Let the goldfinches be furnished their humble dinner. Let the sparrows determine their homes in security. Let the honeysuckle reach as high as my window, that it may look in. Let the mice fill the barns and bins with a sufficiency. Let anything created, that wants to creep or leap forward, be able to do so. Let the grasshopper have gliding space. Let the noise of the mower be banished, yes, yes. Let the katydid return and announce himself in the long evenings. Let the blades of grass surge back from the last cutting. Or, if you want to be poetic: the leaves of grass. If you try to find “On Not Mowing the Lawn” on the internet, or at least the version that I just read, you won’t be able to. So many of Oliver’s poems have grass and lawns and nature involved in them that you can keep scrolling and never find the poem you were looking for. But that, in a way, is what books are made for. To be held, and for their pages to be turned, and for their satisfying smell to be sucked in through your nostrils. Books give people thrills, no matter what author, genre, or subject. For Oliver, nature does this too. She expresses some of this in not mowing the lawn, practically singing about grass and its wonders — “let the grass spring up tall, let its roots sing/and the seeds begin their scattering.” At the same time, the poem is also an excuse in verse, or simply a way to procrastinate such a tedious chore as mowing the lawn. The poem is at once an ode to letting nature run its course, to letting plants and animals live without human interference, but it is also an extremely detailed and therefore “intellectual” way of getting out of something she doesn’t want to do. It is a way to make more time for her to simply lie on the grass, admiring it and writing more poems about it for people to enjoy. “On Not Mowing the Lawn,” exaggerates the concept of allowing all living things to have free will. She describes mice scurrying around in barns uninterrupted, grasshoppers clearing space for themselves, and katydids coming to sing as loudly as they want. Oliver writes, “let anything created, that wants to creep or leap forward, be able to do so.” She speaks of banishing the lawn mower as a way to do this, as a way to let nature become wild, as it truly should be. “On Not Mowing the Lawn,” is a poem full of imagery, allowing you to see everything that Oliver describes and to place yourself in that peaceful circle of nature. Something I found interesting in this poem was the last line. Oliver writes, “Or, if you want to be poetic: the leaves of grass.” As I said earlier, one of Oliver’s favorite poets was Walt Whitman, and “leaves of grass” is the title of his one and only collection of poems. In a way, this line is a homage to Whitman. This part of Oliver’s poem is funny, because, even though “On Not Mowing the Lawn” is a poem, she says, “if you want to be poetic.” This also makes me think about ideas or words that are “poetic,” versus ideas and words that aren’t. Really, there is no such thing. Oliver happens to use simple words and images in her poetry, and other poets might not, but if a poem is good, it will convey a powerful idea in a way that leaves you feeling something. “On Not Mowing the Lawn,” is a poem that offers insight on both nature and letting it run wild and also on how to get out of doing a chore. I hope you enjoyed this episode of Poetry Soup, and I’ll see you with the next one!
Home Sick, a poem by Carolina Ulloa-Compton, 12
staying at homeand being alonemy mom says it will endbut my dad says this is not the enddiscussing what will happenof something that we don’t know nobody knows longing for normalcylike a curious mousewondering when it will endwhen even a feather could break meinto microscopic piecesthat no one would noticeI am dead on the inside just a screen to stare atonly memes to giggle atlike the sunset on the other side going to the bathroom was never so easyjust a quick walkto the other side of the roomand the same path that now becomes my roommy boring roomand my messy roomeverything is the sameexcept when the broom streaks my roomfrom the dust and boredomthat this Covid brings through my room when can I stop staring at initials in front of a screen of math?with no understanding of what is onwhen no one believes that we will be freeof the sorrow and worrythat this brings