Young Bloggers

Sherlock Holmes

Every year, thousands of characters are formulated, some are loved, some are hated, some are dismissed, some are complex, some are comical, some are for kids, some for grown-ups and some are legends. The bulk of all fictional characters are soon replaced by new, more modern fictional personalities because they are too pedestrian, they do not have a deep impact on the readers. They soon fade out, and are forgotten. There are precious little who are legends, who transcend centuries and are admired universally. Recently, the genre of crime fiction has begun to fascinate me. So with plenty of spare time this winter break, I decided to review one of the books in the Sherlock Holmes series. But I was perplexed as I oscillated between which book to choose, as they each had their own sublime plots and were equally intriguing. So, I began to wonder about the one item in all the books which rendered them unique. It soon dawned upon me that the real reason was because of the protagonist himself! In a time and age in which modern technology becomes redundant in a matter of months, this luminary has left such a profound impact on the readers and non-readers alike, that he is still regarded as a paragon of crime detection, even after a century. And so, after much deliberation, the idea flashed to dedicate an article to this king of crime fiction, instead of limiting myself to a book review. With 60 fantastic stories, Sherlock Holmes never fails to captivate the reader with his superb deduction skills and his shrewd thinking. With a unique personality, this stolid and astute detective is infallible. He is a boxer, singlestick (fighting or fencing with a wooden stick or sword held in one hand) player, an expert violin player and much more. Until the end of a mystery, he remains reticent and does not explain his actions or thought process. His companion, Dr. Watson, was often lucky even when he just told him where they were going. One of his eccentricities is that though he is a master at everything he does, he seems to be indisposed to learning anything which does not relate to his profession. Watson puts his ignorance like this, with devastating accuracy: “His ignorance was just as remarkable as his knowledge.”  The most fascinating fact for me is that he is oblivious to the basic fact that the Earth revolves around the Sun, and that even though Dr. Watson told him, he does his best to forget it. He is afraid that his brain will get crowded with superfluous information and he will forget the things that matter to him. Though the police force is always there to officially investigate a crime scene, their investigation seems amateurish compared to Sherlock Holmes. The former can only stand by as an audience as the unofficial detective punctiliously closes his nets around the murderer in a matter of days. He loves to take on the daunting prospect of dealing with Mephistophelean forces, while belittling the police force the whole time. He chaffs the police, and looks at their futile attempts to solve a mystery in disdain. While reading his books, I was imbued with admiration for Holmes’s “Theory of Deduction.” It is a quintessential part of his genius. In a nutshell, he “works backwards.” If you give most people the events, they can usually figure out the end result. But, if you give Sherlock Holmes the end result he can work backwards and figure out the turn of events which led to that result. This theory is the underlying principle for solving any mystery. Even though contemporary crimes, such as cybercrime are harder to track, and modern techniques are now used, Holmes’s “Theory of Deduction” always holds true. The theory is actually, as Holmes says, “simplicity itself.” He uses his meticulous observations, which we see but consider unimportant, like variables in a sum, which all add up to the end result (the crime). He figured out that his friend Watson was sitting in a cab  (a horse-drawn carriage with no doors) with someone else, as there was mud on only one side of his trousers, so he couldn’t have sat in the middle. Therefore, there was another person with him in the cab. His seemingly endless knowledge helps him deduce where people had been, how old a piece of parchment was just by looking at one corner of it, he can decode a message without a key, a whole mystery without moving from his chair, he can solve the most singular case with barely any evidence, and I could keep on going on forever. This concept is very basic, and yet is the backbone for all of his deductions. While reading his books, I really feel that Arthur Conan Doyle has brought a really illustrious character to life. This article is meant as a tribute for the exalted duo of Holmes and Arthur Conan Doyle.   

Notes on our Nation, an inauguration day poem by Sofie, 10

We the People have been creating cacophony dissonant chords and jagged notes, scattered rests and twisted octaves the chaotic melody vanquishing a weak, sibilant harmony as tritone chords overwhelm the concert while the awkward bass clef fails to signal the start of the ensemble in an imperfect union. We the People have not yet accomplished our orchestral objectives the jarring and unbalanced rhythm flat, staccato, and splintered the staff becoming abstruse, the treble clef abandoning its position as the bass, melody, and voicings belong to different pieces preventing the construction of a pleasing arrangement when the white and black keys are in opposition forming an imperfect union. We the People of the United States are ready now to establish justice fairness and equality the chords pulsing in uniform tempo a smooth cadence every instrument has a chance its voice being heard the harmony fluently resting in the middle following the score and rhythm of the music in order to form a more perfect union. We the People of the United States have voted to insure domestic tranquility protect the nation’s peace the notes calmly flowing through the harmony every note as one working together to rise to the voicings of the chords crescendos and diminuendos vibratos and sustains the mellow rests allowing reflection in order to form a more perfect union. We the People of the United States commit to provide for the common defense protect our nation the sixteenth notes enfolding the eighth notes while the notes of the chords secure one another as the staff is accompanied by the crystalline time signature every musical element flowing to another in order to form a more perfect union. We the People of the United States shall promote the general welfare help people live better when in need the notes intersect with others as the rests make space to accommodate the whole notes every note supporting the other just as the bass, melody, harmony, and voicings Spiral in layers shaping the music in order to form a more perfect union. We the People of the United States with certainty will secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity make sure we are free and remain free as each sharp and flat takes hold of the staff and the quarter notes swell into whole notes for each note, rest, chord, has a role in the symphony to stand out and contribute to the music in order to form a more perfect union. We the People of the United States are ready for a new composition a glorious riot of sound and a jubilant melody ready to lift us up soaring upon triumphant wings of a more perfect union. Sofie Dardzinski, 10Potomac, MD

Stone Soup Author Interview: Enni Harlan

Stone Soup contributor and 20-21 intern Anya Geist, 14, talks with three time winner of the Weekly Flash Contest Enni Harlan, 13, about writing a novel, the research that goes into historical fiction, and the feeling of living in your story. 0:18 – How were you introduced to Stone Soup? 0:49 – How did you decide to submit to the Flash Contests and how did you feel when you won? 1:05 – Did you ever not win when you submitted? 1:18 – What was it like to receive a rejection? 1:28 – Have you ever submitted to Stone Soup Magazine? 1:39 – Did it feel different to submit to the Magazine than it felt to submit to the Flash Contest? 2:08 – What was your favorite part about the Writing Workshop? 2:30 – How did it feel to write a book? 2:53 – What was your book about? 3:24 – Would you write another historical fiction novel? 3:49 – What was your favorite part about writing a book? 4:06 – How did it feel to submit the finished product? 4:45 – What is your favorite thing about writing? 5:05 – Which is your favorite genre to write in? 5:29 – Do you find that the writing you do for school is different from the writing you do for fun? 6:03 – Do you have any writing advice for your peers? 6:21 – How would you describe Stone Soup?